HI6006 Competitive Strategy Editing Service
Delivery in day(s): 4
Strategic choice making has become one of the most important factors in the success of organisation and several elements are responsible for its efficiency. The current essay has focused on providing a critical analysis of the contribution provided by strategic choice and determinist theories towards the understanding of organizational behavior action. In this context, the importance of strategic choice is analysed following a detailed discussion on determinist theories highlighting three theories like institutional theory, resource dependency theory and population ecology theory. Then a suitable perspective is provided for the most influential strategic determinism.
For stimulating sustainable decision making effective process of strategic choice is quite an important factor and the heart of well strategic planning based on the capability of surfacing significant issues and making good choices in decision process for catering to such issues. In the context of general management strategic choice is referred to as power relationships in different contexts of organisation and organisational members bearing the role of managerial responsibilities are not only limited to certain contextual factors like environment factors or availability of technologies or other environmental factors but they are exposed to certain decision making as well (Grant, 2016). Strategic choice process refers to the corporate strategy of organisation comprising of numbers of factors like exploring strategic options variety that often emerges as the very essence for corporate strategy.
Necessarily at the initiation of strategic choice process it is required to state, reaffirm and agree the organisation’s fundamental purpose. In this context clear definite understanding is required in relation to the understanding that is going to enjoy the benefit and their expectation from organisation. Most significant strategic choice is determined through different factors like nature of the benefit, intended beneficiaries as well as indicator of benefit delivery to beneficiaries. Top management and the governing body of the organisation stand in frontline for accelerating clear agreement about each choice making which is the most elemental purpose of organisation. Sound choice making for an organisation is characterised by the attributes of believability, authenticity, deliverability and communicability. In order to make authentic strategic choice the managers must consider that the organisation follows options clearly and who can be beneficial by such decisions (Wheelen & Hunger, 2017). Authentic choice constructs the very basis that the business is going to compete and the way through which firm is going to accomplish competitive advantage for the selected customer segments. Believable choice stimulates from the commitments and evidence from team members responsible in the context of decision making. Lastly, the strategic choice needs to be communicated properly otherwise all efforts will go in vain.
The basic assumption associated with Resource Dependence theory (RDT) is trying to ensure the survival of an organisation. RDT is responsible for characterizing the organisation as open system and the importance of this theory lies in managers’ ability to optimize environmental dependence and uncertainty. The basic argument forwarded by Prefer in the context of this theory is fundamental units for the understanding of society and incorporate relations as organizations, the organizations cannot be considered as autonomous rather it is dependent on the interdependencies associated with other organisations (Burke, 2017). The third unit is interdependencies coupled with uncertainty of actions on which organisations are interdependent results in circumstances where continued success and survival are quite uncertain. The fourth unit suggests that the organisations are often accelerated towards taking actions for the management of external interdependencies though such actions are never successful and results in producing patterns of interdependencies and dependencies. Dependence pattern contributes towards producing intra-organisational and inter-organisational power affecting organizational behaviour.
From this discussion the importance of two variables like power and dependence is realized. Each organisation is capable3 of obtaining power and competing with other resulting in the issue of the survival of organisation as constrained to the organisations’ action in environment. RDT has described this aspect as organisations’ interdependence on environment. RDT has understood the fact that each of the actor’s within the organisation desires to increase their power over others and reduce dependence (Lenski 2015). RDT describes the action of organisation in collaborating with mergers by proposing three significant perspectives like for reducing competition by divulging a significant competitor, diversification of operations for lessening dependence on the organisation for exchange and managing interdependence through absorption. On the contrary (), has criticised RDT for the deficiency in discrimination between mutual dependence and power imbalance, confounding theoretical predictions and normative prescriptions, possessing ambiguities in boundary considerations and focusing more on dependence of one of the actors on other rather reciprocal interdependence.
Earlier works of research have found RDT’s application is supportive towards Joint ventures as it is found most commonly in interdependent firms.Hubbard, Rice & Galvin(2014) has found that forming alliances in low environmental circumstances are more favourable towards the reaction of stock market, indicating dependency magnitude for successful prediction of these forms.Booth(2015) has found that firms are responsible for accomplishing power over the providers of resource through entering into alliances while it is found that corporate relationships are more advantageous for smaller firms. Scholars are quite focused on dynamic nature of power and interdependence derived from RDT. Through the discussion of various scholars it is understood that RDT is beneficial in terms of general relationships among firms, their actions and environments for the reduction of dependencies though regions of executive succession and political action are not explored properly. The application of RDT in executive succession is dependent on assertions that executive succession is responsible for reducing environmental dependencies and external dependencies determine inter-organizational power.
Institutional theorists are responsible for asserting the fact that the environment of institution can influence strongly on formal structures development of the organisation. Innovative structures contributing towards the development of technical efficiency act legitimately within the organisation.Kozlenkova, Samaha & Palmatier(2014) has argued that the institutional myths are often accepted merely for maintaining and gaining legitimacy in institutional environment. Structure vocabularies are adapted by organisations relevant to their environment like specific titles of job, procedures as well as roles of organisation. The organisational action is helped through the prominent display and adoption of such institutionally accepted legitimacy trappings. In the environment of institution legitimacy is responsible for ensuring the survival of organisation. For eliminating negative impact, organizations often decouple core of technology from the structures of legitimacy. Organisations result in minimizing implementation of neglect program for the maintenance of external confidence while optimising its impact on efficiency.
Powell and DiMaggio have concluded with the fact that the total effect of the pressures of institution results in increasing organisational structure homogeneity in the environment of institution. In current years policy makers and scho0lars are paying increasing attention for asserting complex relationship between economic development and institutions. () has examined the fact that during high level of cooperation and consensus within the environment of institution innovative structure diffusion is quite long-lasting and steady. Innovative structure adoption on the other hand is quite low during unfocused and contentious institutional environment. On the other hand,Suddaby(2015) has found the fact that organisations are responsible for adapting innovative structures during high coercive pressures whereas adoption rate is quite slower during low coercive pressures. Legitimacy is built with increased adoption accelerating adoption rate of structural form.Fuenfschilling & Truffer(2014) have confirmed the fact that later organisations embrace structural form for the maintenance of legitimacy while earlier organisation depends on new forms to increase efficiency.
The strength of institutional theory lies in the fact that it has tried to make sense of the organisations as a part of complex system of society that has understood organisations in de-contextualized and rationalist perspective and thus it has emerged its head as the dominant factor in management and strategic choice making of an organisation. On the contrary,Booth(2015) has criticised this theory stating the fact that institutional theory has resulted in ignoring differences between organisations as well as overlooking comparativeorganisationalvalues.
Ecology refers to the living organisms’ interaction with the environment. Population ecology, on the other hand, deals with ecological discipline communicating with dynamics and structure of the population of biology. Thus, the focus of population ecology is on single population or on one of the few species involved in interaction. According toVayanos & Woolley(2013), the population of any organisation is determined by all organizations within specific boundary possessing common form. In the literature of strategic management and economics industry forms the closest counterpart. Population ecology theory is determined by various factors. Inertia and change suggests that the organisations are reliable and accountable towards those who can survive following the principle of natural selection. Niche theory of population ecology distinguishes two organisation types like specialists and generalists. Specialist organizations are responsible for maximising environment exploitation and showing acceptance towards the risk of experiencing chance in concerned environment. Generalized organisation contributes towards greater security through the exploitation at lower level. Resource partitioning contributes towards integrating a relationship between specialist and generalised organisations.
This model predicts about mortality rates and founding of both generalists and specialists as the function of concentration towards market. Density dependence includes predictions of founding rates and mortality rates as dependent on the organisation numbers. The concepts of supply and demand are closely associated with density dependence sub theory. Age dependence is responsible for exhibiting the ways through which mortality risks of organisations is connected with the age of that organisation. In the liability towards newness initially failure risk is quite high while it gradually declines as organisational change is confronted with environmental change (Vayanos & Woolley, 2013). The failure probability increases with the risk of change and if the change in environment is uncontrolled. Initially mortality risk is low as organisational has suffered from failure situation with cumulative change of environment and then the failure probability increases due to uncontrolled environmental change. Liability of aging states that failure of risk increases with the change in organisation.
Hannan and Freeman have advanced t6his theory the core competence of organisation is its strategy and internal pressure is responsible for preventing sharp changes in present strategy. The ecology and demography of organizations is quite appropriate when organizations have to succumb under inertial pressure. This theory proposes the fact that de4nsity of ecology is one of the most important factors accelerating strategic choice and change. Industry of high density is responsible for worsening competition. The relevance of this theory in organisation context is that it proposes the idea that in the diversity of organisation long run changes reflects accumulated consequences in the differences of short-run in populations’ net mortality rate. Om the contrary,Suddaby(2015) has argued introduction of complexity theory is necessary for complementing ecology based strategy of organisation. Darwin’s evolutionism is responsible for regarding natural selection as the single drive for biological evolution and neglected orders generating complex systems. Self-organized components of this theory survive, organize, innovate, develop and evolve by it without exhibiting much dependence on external orders.
Population ecology theory can be considered as the most suitable approach for strategic choice and change adaptation. The application of this population ecology theory in the organizational context can assist theorist for identifying an analogue of species for the organisation this identification can be responsible for enabling theorists for the development of organisational blueprints determining eventually the organisational output as the result of organisation input. This development of defined form of organisation thus, in turn, can provide a definite system for the study of the relation between environment and organisation for this population in the contecxt of political;, social geographical and market boundaries (Kisaka & Anthony, 2014). Population ecology in the organisation is also responsible for making it understand that the organisational dynamics face minimum choice of chances for getting involved in adaptation due to extreme constraints in environment. Both Freeman and Hannan has provided enough grounds for such arguments. Population concepts in the organisation contribute towards providing further insights into the structure of organisation which other theories fail to explain (Wilbon,, 2015). Organisation classes can be identified in homogenous terms of the vulnerability in environment.
It is understood that strategic choice making is extremely important in the context of organisation. In this relation the importance of determinist theories are understood. It is also realized that population ecology is the most suitable approach for strategic decision making for its close alignment with flexibility in adaption. This theory proposes the fact that de4nsity of ecology is one of the most important factors accelerating strategic choice and change. Industry of high density is responsible for worsening competition. The relevance of this theory in organisation context is that it proposes the idea that in the diversity of organisation long run changes reflects accumulated consequences in the differences of short-run in populations’ net mortality rate.