COIT20251 Knowledge Audits for Business Analysis Proof Reading Service

COIT20251 Knowledge Audits for Business Analysis Assignment

COIT20251 Knowledge Audits for Business Analysis Proof Reading Service

Introduction

The discussion deals with the implementation of a process in an organization in order to audit the human capital of a business. It is very important for a company to maintain a competitive position for a long period of time, for that the human capital or the intellectual capital is regarded strength. In order to verify the skills and knowledge of the various intellectual capital of the business various techniques have been followed by a business As a management process the implementation of the “STOCKS” or Strategic Tools to Capture Critical Knowledge and Skills as the process of analyzing the human capital and its quality can be utilized. The report deals with the adaptation of such process that would ensure in maintaining the creativity and quality of intellectual resources of a business and its workforces. The stocks are basically are indicators of the intellectual capital that would audit the human resources of the business (Dumay 2016). The whole process is known as Knowledge management which should be the first competency that an organization must develops for intellectual capital management. The mechanism of Knowledge audit can effectively support the organizations in achieving targeted objectives, managing their own knowledge and favoring the intellectual creation capital valuing. The process of knowledge audit must focus on both the stock nature of knowledge, as it constitutes the intellectual capital of organizations, and the flow nature of knowledge, as it relates to the knowledge management activities within the business processes (Marchington, Wilkinson Donnelly and Kynighou 2016).

Discussion

The discussion deals with the implementation of a process in an organization in order to audit the human capital of a business. The mechanism of Knowledge audit can effectively support the organizations in achieving targeted objectives, managing their own knowledge and favoring the intellectual creation capital valuing (Wang, Wang and Liang 2014). The process of knowledge audit must focus on both the stock nature of knowledge, as it constitutes the intellectual capital of organizations, and the flow nature of knowledge, as it relates to the knowledge management activities within the business processes.

Project background

The chosen company in the given case study company is GPBI, which is one of the leading battery manufacturers in the world. It supplies an extensive range of battery products to original equipment manufacturers and leading battery companies, as well as consumer retail markets under its own brand name. GPBI has been listed on the main-board of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited since 1991 and is currently a component stock of the Singapore Regional Index. Its production facilities are located in 5 cities and countries of Asia, supported by marketing and trading offices in 16 countries and cities in Asia, America and Europe. The GPBI Quality Assurance Departments of both Headquarters and the production plants have wide knowledge and expertise on quality related issues. The company of GPBI quality management processes includes a prevention-based and quality improvement-based technique that is named Value Added Quality Management Processes (VAQMP). In order to manage the knowledge among the VAQMP, knowledge audits have been conducted for assessing the knowledge assets. The report wounds critically analyze the implementation of the STOCKS in the company with respect to VAQMP for this specific company.

Objectives and Issues

This research project selected the GPBI company for identifying the knowledge assets and knowledge follows the VAQMP through STOCKS knowledge audit methodology.. In order to analyze the STOCKS approach, face-to-face individual interviews were conducted to collect the audit data (Reiche et al. 2016). The overall process includes building knowledge inventory, filling, , data validation, data analysis, identification of the IC indicators, construction of IC value tree and IC reporting followed by recommendations for a knowledge management strategy of continuous quality improvement.

In the chosen company of the assessment tools for the most of intellectual capital does not explore deeply into the particular business process and the specific knowledge needs. The primary issue that was faced during the whole process was time management (Inkinen 2015). In addition to that the face-to face individual interview was one of the most challenging tasks in this project since the interviews required the interviewer to be skilful in asking questions. The STOCKS interviewer needs necessarily to be well trained and familiar with the covered subject matter before the knowledge audit implementation (Sydler, Haefliger and Pruksa, 2014). Moreover, the interviewer needed to be minimum bias from personal opinions that may be a challenge for the whole process of interview.

Organizational strategies and stakeholders

In the chosen company of the assessment tools for the most of intellectual capital does not explore deeply into the particular business process and the specific knowledge needs. For this study, Value Added Quality Management Processes (VAQMP were selected for conducting structured knowledge audits with intellectual capital. On the other hand the structured knowledge audit tool, STOCKS, was selected to compare and contest between the trwo processes. The STOCKS, refers to “Strategic Tools to Capture Critical Knowledge and Skills”. It is a process-oriented knowledge audit approach for evaluating the „knowledge health? of an organization (Hislop, Bosua and Helms 2018). Prior to the commencement of individual interviews, participants working in different departments and at different levels were invited to fill in various questionnaires to identify the frequency of use of IT platforms, document flows, knowledge flows and the corresponding knowledge sources, as well as the critical knowledge deployed in each task in the process.

In the analysis of the intellectual audit process, the Stakeholder analysis in the STOCKS knowledge audit methodology was used to describe the processes in the departments that are likely to contribute to explicit and tacit knowledge. According to the knowledge inventories, the knowledge owners can be identified in each key process (Collings, Wood and Szamosi 2018). The large stakeholder group may result in a high knowledge throughput. In this case, the major stakeholder groups of all VAQMP key processes were within GPBI, Therefore, the risk of knowledge leakage was less.

Business context and business case

The company of GPBI quality management processes includes a prevention-based and quality improvement-based technique that is named Value Added Quality Management Processes (VAQMP). In order to manage the knowledge among the VAQMP, knowledge audits have been conducted for assessing the knowledge assets. In the current discussion it is to be verified that the implementation of the STOCKS or “Strategic Tools to Capture Critical Knowledge and Skills” would be more effective fore analyzing the intellectual capital of the business. So that that there is quality production and better utilization of the human resources (Dumay and Cai 2015). As a management process the implementation of the “STOCKS” or Strategic Tools to Capture Critical Knowledge and Skills as the process of analyzing the human capital and its quality can be utilized. The report deals with the adaptation of such process that would ensure in maintaining the creativity and quality of intellectual resources of a business and its workforces. The stocks are basically are indicators of the intellectual capital that would audit the human resources of the business. The whole process is known as the Knowledge management which should be the first competency that an organization must develops for intellectual capital management (Utc.edu. 2018). In the current scenario various analysis was done that includes stakeholders? analysis, identification of critical explicit knowledge and the corresponding knowledge workers, the knowledge fountain of the process, as well as knowledge maps. Based on all the standard findings and the analysis results from STOCKS, an additional comparison on the VAQMP was made to provide deeper understanding the performance of the human capital of the company (Brunswicker and Vanhaverbeke 2015). As the Intellectual Capital indicators were identified by the utilization of the structured knowledge audit results. These IC indicators from the knowledge flow data can be used to reflect the “healthiness” of the studied KM processes

Statement of current business processes and problems

This research project selected the GPBI Company for identifying the knowledge assets and knowledge follows the VAQMP through STOCKS knowledge audit methodology. As a management processes the implementation of the “STOCKS” or Strategic Tools to Capture Critical Knowledge and Skills as the process of analyzing the human capital and its quality can be utilized. The report deals with the adaptation of such process that would ensure in maintaining the creativity and quality of intellectual resources of a business and its workforces (Kianto, Ritala, Spender and Vanhala 2014). Some of the assumptions may not reflect the whole situation in an organization. The studies described in this paper regarding intellectual capital reporting were only focused on VAQMP key processes but not the whole organization’s business processes. With the huge amount of data from the STOCKS knowledge audit, rather than using a lot of manual time of data entry, the project team used supplementary software, “AutoSTOCKS” from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, to consolidate the audit data systematically (Brewster and Hegewisch 2017). The knowledge auditors need to be well trained and several practiced in the trial tests prior to conducting the formal audit. The organization needs to train-up quite a lot of knowledge auditors prior to extending such research to the whole organization.

Proposed new System/s

In order to verify the skills and knowledge of the various intellectual capital of the business various techniques have been followed by a business As a management process the implementation of the “STOCKS” or Strategic Tools to Capture Critical Knowledge and Skills as the process of analyzing the human capital and its quality can be utilized (Pauleen, and Gorman 2016). The report deals with the adaptation of such process that would ensure in maintaining the creativity and quality of intellectual resources of a business and its workforces. The stocks are basically are indicators of the intellectual capital that would audit the human resources of the business (Omotayo 2015). In the current discussion it is to be verified that the implementation of the STOCKS or “Strategic Tools to Capture Critical Knowledge and Skills” would be more effective for analyzing the intellectual capital of the business. However, the company of GPBI quality management processes includes a prevention-based and quality improvement-based technique that is named Value Added Quality Management Processes (VAQMP). The comparison is to be made between the two.

Method of evaluation for the users to follow while using the system

In this paper, the Human Capital” is termed as human centered assets, employee competence, the Structural Capital is termed as infrastructure assets, internal structure and the Relational Capital is termed as market assets, external structure and customer capital. The company is defines the Human Capital as the combined knowledge, skill, innovativeness and ability of individual employees to complete the business process task. Human capital also includes value, culture and philosophy of an organization, but it cannot be owned by the organization (Becerra-Fernandez and Sabherwal 2014). The Structural Capital as in the case is defined as the hardware, software, database, organizational structure, patents, trademarks and other organizational capabilities that support the productivity of employees. Differing from human capital, structural capital can be owned by the organization. Lastly the Relational Capital is the knowledge embedded in the relationships with any stakeholder that influences the organization. It is used to show the external structure and includes relationships with customers, suppliers and other stakeholders, as well as the importance of the external environment. It encompasses brand names, trademarks and image of the organization. This research project selected the GPBI company for identifying the knowledge assets and knowledge flows of the VAQMP through STOCKS knowledge audit methodology (Armstrong and Taylor 2014). In order to analyze the STOCKS approach, face-to-face individual interviews were conducted to collect the audit data. The overall process includes building knowledge inventory, filling, data validation, data analysis, identification of the IC indicators, construction of IC value tree and IC reporting followed by recommendations for a knowledge management strategy of continuous quality improvement.

Conclusion

The discussion deals with the implementation of a process in an organization in order to audit the human capital of a business. The mechanism of Knowledge audit can effectively support the organizations in achieving targeted objectives, managing their own knowledge and favoring the intellectual creation capital valuing. In the current discussion it is to be verified that the implementation of the STOCKS or “Strategic Tools to Capture Critical Knowledge and Skills” would be more effective for analyzing the intellectual capital of the business. However, the company of GPBI quality management processes includes a prevention-based and quality improvement-based technique that is named Value Added Quality Management Processes (VAQMP).It can be said from the above analysis the implementation of the STOCKS is more effective in conducting an audit human capital the chosen business and its quality. The whole process is known as the Knowledge management which should be the first competency that an organization must develops for intellectual capital management. The mechanism of Knowledge audit can effectively support the organizations in achieving targeted objectives, managing their own knowledge and favoring the intellectual creation capital valuing.

References

1. Armstrong, M. and Taylor, S., 2014. Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page Publishers.
2. Becerra-Fernandez, I. and Sabherwal, R., 2014. Knowledge management: Systems and processes. Routledge.
3. Brewster, C. and Hegewisch, A. eds., 2017. Policy and practice in European human resource management: The Price Waterhouse Cranfield survey. Taylor & Francis.
4. Brunswicker, S. and Vanhaverbeke, W., 2015. Open innovation in small and medium?sized enterprises (SMEs): External knowledge sourcing strategies and internal organizational facilitators. Journal of Small Business Management53(4), pp.1241-1263.
5. Collings, D.G., Wood, G.T. and Szamosi, L.T., 2018. Human resource management: A critical approach. In Human Resource Management (pp. 1-23). Routledge.
6. Dumay, J. and Cai, L., 2015. Using content analysis as a research methodology for investigating intellectual capital disclosure: a critique. Journal of Intellectual Capital16(1), pp.121-155.
7. Dumay, J., 2016. A critical reflection on the future of intellectual capital: from reporting to disclosure. Journal of Intellectual capital17(1), pp.168-184.
8. Hislop, D., Bosua, R. and Helms, R., 2018. Knowledge management in organizations: A critical introduction. Oxford University Press.
9. Inkinen, H., 2015. Review of empirical research on intellectual capital and firm performance. Journal of Intellectual capital16(3), pp.518-565.
10. Kianto, A., Ritala, P., Spender, J.C. and Vanhala, M., 2014. The interaction of intellectual capital assets and knowledge management practices in organizational value creation. Journal of Intellectual capital15(3), pp.362-375.
11. Marchington, M., Wilkinson, A., Donnelly, R. and Kynighou, A., 2016. Human resource management at work. Kogan Page Publishers.
12. Omotayo, F.O., 2015. Knowledge Management as an important tool in Organisational Management: A Review of Literature.
13. Pauleen, D.J. and Gorman, G.E., 2016. The nature and value of personal knowledge management. In Personal Knowledge Management (pp. 23-38). Routledge.
14. Reiche, B.S., Stahl, G.K., Mendenhall, M.E. and Oddou, G.R. eds., 2016. Readings and cases in international human resource management. Taylor & Francis.
15. Sydler, R., Haefliger, S. and Pruksa, R., 2014. Measuring intellectual capital budgeting with financial figures: Can we predict firm profitability?. European Management Journal32(2), pp.244-259.
16. Utc.edu. 2018. Mark Mendenhall. [online] Available at: https://www.utc.edu/college-business/profiles/management/jkh123.php [Accessed 29 Sep. 2018].
17. Wang, Z., Wang, N. and Liang, H., 2014. Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm performance. Management decision52(2), pp.230-258.