Crop Growth and Development Proof Reading and Editing Services

Crop Growth and Development Oz Assignments

Crop Growth and Development Proof Reading and Editing Services

1. Part One - Measurable Organisational Value

 1.1. Identification of the Area of Impac

Factor

Description

Ranking

Customer

The focus of the customer is high on the project as Globex wants the application for its customers only

1

Financial

Economical impact on operations would be effective for the development of the successful execution of the activities.

2

Operational

Operations of the organization is a must as the application is supposed to make it more effective

3

Strategy

Strategies of implementing the development factors would be eased with the consideration of the factors and development.

4

Social

Social influence of operations would be implied with the involvement of the successive development factor.

5

1.2. Identification of the Desired Value

Value

Metrics

Time Frame

Better

Number of operations

3 months

Faster

Delivery time

2 months

Cheaper

Cost Incurred

5 months

Do More

Effectiveness

8 months

2. Part Two – Project Scope

2.1. In Scope

1. Development of the Project Plan
2. Design of Cash Application
3. Development of Cash Application
4. Testing of Cash Application
5. Final Documentation

2.2. Out of Scope

1. Training of the users
2. Change Management
3. Scope Creep Analysis

2.3. People and their Roles

Resource Name

Roles

Financial manager

Management of the Cash Application

Project manager

Management of the project activities

Project planner

Project Scheduling

Developer

Development of Application

System engineer

Integration of system functions

Designer

Design development

Tester

Testing the system for functions

System analyst

Analyzing the system requirements

Database administrator

Management of the database

Human resource manager

Management of the human resources

Risk analyst

Analyzing the project risks

Programmer

Programming the application

System administrator

Managing system functions

Software engineer

Integration of system functions

2.4. Technology (Hardware, Software and Network)

2.4.1. Hardware and Network Requirements

Computer System, Router, Switch, and NIC card

2.4.2. Software Requirements

Application UI, Programming, Designing, and Testing Software

2.5. Facilities

3. Part Three – Work Breakdown Structure

3.1. High Level Work Break Down Structure

3.2. Gantt Chart and Project Schedule

The Gantt chart for the project is shown below,

3.3. Milestones

WBS

Task Name

Duration

Start

Finish

M1

Kick off

0 days

Mon 8/6/18

Mon 8/6/18

M2

Plan Approval

0 days

Mon 8/20/18

Mon 8/20/18

M3

Design Approval

0 days

Tue 8/28/18

Tue 8/28/18

M4

System Developed

0 days

Thu 9/27/18

Thu 9/27/18

M5

Test Documentation

0 days

Thu 10/11/18

Thu 10/11/18

M6

System Live

0 days

Thu 10/18/18

Thu 10/18/18

M7

Project Closed

0 days

Mon 10/22/18

Mon 10/22/18

3.4. Resource Usage

3.5. Project Budget

Resource Name

Work

Standard Rate

Cost

Financial manager

80 hrs

$ 70.00/hr

$ 5,600.00

Project manager

80 hrs

$ 80.00/hr

$ 6,400.00

Project planner

56 hrs

$ 40.00/hr

$ 2,240.00

Developer

64 hrs

$ 60.00/hr

$ 3,840.00

System engineer

96 hrs

$ 75.00/hr

$ 7,200.00

Designer

32 hrs

$ 50.00/hr

$ 1,600.00

Tester

104 hrs

$ 50.00/hr

$ 5,200.00

System analyst

32 hrs

$ 55.00/hr

$ 1,760.00

Database administrator

64 hrs

$ 60.00/hr

$ 3,840.00

Human resource manager

88 hrs

$ 70.00/hr

$ 6,160.00

Risk analyst

80 hrs

$ 40.00/hr

$ 3,200.00

Programmer

48 hrs

$ 65.00/hr

$ 3,120.00

System administrator

128 hrs

$ 70.00/hr

$ 8,960.00

Software engineer

104 hrs

$ 75.00/hr

$ 7,800.00

Hardware and software requirements

1

$ 5,000.00

$ 5,000.00

Additional cost

1

$ 3,000.00

$ 3,000.00

Total Budget

$74,920.00

4. Part Four – Assumptions and Risks

4.1. Assumptions

1. Important Documentation would be done by the users
2. All bugs and errors would be fixed in the estimated time
3. Cash Application would be compatible with the user’s requirements

4.2. Risks

Risk

Probability

(1-5)

Impact

(1-5)

Rating

P*I

Over budget

4

3

8

Delay of Schedule

5

2

10

Performance Issues

3

5

15

Programming Errors

2

4

8

Missing Function

4

5

20

5. Part Five – Quality
5.1. Quality Statements

The new cash application for Globex would ensure that the requirements of the client for easing their customer’s operations would be done by following the software engineering activities.

5.2. Verification Activities

Testing methods of White Box, Black Box, User Interface. Prototyping, and Simulation would be used as verification activities.

5.3. Validation Activities

Quality Control, Evaluation Checklist, and Feasible Project Plan analysis would be used as the validation activities.

6. Part Six – Project Evaluation

6.1. Annotated Bibliography

Article: A computerized method for delay risk assessment based on fuzzy set theory using MS Project™

Journal: KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

Authors: Budayan, C., Dikmen, I., Birgonul, M. T., and Ghaziani, A.

Year of Publication: 2018

Synopsis: According to Budayan, Dikmen, Birgonul and Ghaziani (2018), the Ms-Project software can be helpful for defining the influence of the risk management. The analysis of the fuzzy set theory would align with the development of the successive management of the activities and implying the innovative and improved functional management using successful development of project schedule using Ms-Project. The risk assessment is helpful for enduring the analysis of the factors for developing the successful integration and alignment of the cohesive project integration. The analysis would also be helpful for taking care of the risk assessment and development of the factors for the integration management. The integration would be aligned for the management of the successful formation and introducing the utilization and formation.

Article: How does risk management influence production decisions? Evidence from a field experiment

Journal: The Review of Financial Studies (Vol. 30; Issue no. 6)

Authors: Cole, S., Giné, X., and Vickery, J.

Year of Publication: 2017

Synopsis: According to Cole, Gine and Vickery (2017), risk management holds an integral role in defining the management of the successful management and integration of the factors. The production decisions for the project can be effectively dealt with the innovative and improved analysis model. The risk management operations would be helpful for taking care of the factors for the implementation and utilization factors. The innovation would be more effective for the formation of the impressive management and development. The analysis of the factors for the development and alignment of the factors has been largely helpful for integrating the listing of the factors taking care of the improved analysis and development. The easing of the management model would be implied with the consideration and utilization of the successive development model.

Article: Between cost and benefit: investigating effects of cost management control systems on cost efficiency and organisational performance 

Journal: Journal of Management Control (Vol. 29; Issue no. 1)

Authors: Diefenbach, U., Wald, A., and Gleich, R.

Year of Publication: 2018

Synopsis: According to Diefenbach, Wald and Gleich (2018), the consideration of the factorial representation of the development model would align with the consideration to the formation and listing the innovative management of the factors. The successful management of the factors would help the organization in taking care of the innovation and development. The cost analysis and the management of the resources act as a major factor for integrating the utilization and development. The completion of the successful project completion would be aligned with the management of the successful cost factors. The consideration for the efficiency analysis of the costing factor for the project is aligned with the utilization of the improved functional development.

6.2. Closure Checklist

Is required information and resources for the project comprehensive?

?

Is the project plan feasible?

?

Has the design being approved by the client?

?

Are all the factors for the risk assessment being considered?

?

Is it possible for the actualization of the project?

?

Has the project be approved by the client?

?

Bibliography

1. Almeida, H., Hankins, K. W., & Williams, R. (2017). Risk management with supply contracts. The Review of Financial Studies30(12), 4179-4215.
2. Andersen, K., Thorsteinsson, S. E., Thorbergsson, H., & Gudmundsson, K. S. (2017, July). Developing the academic-industrial partnership through student research and projects: Case studies from Iceland. In Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), 2017 IEEE International (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
3. Budayan, C., Dikmen, I., Birgonul, M. T., & Ghaziani, A. (2018). A computerized method for delay risk assessment based on fuzzy set theory using MS Project™. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 1-12.
4. Burtonshaw-Gunn, S. A. (2017). Risk and financial management in construction. Routledge.
5. Christian, D. (2018). Building Cost Management: Case Study Using Costing Methods. IJAME.
6. Cole, S., Giné, X., & Vickery, J. (2017). How does risk management influence production decisions? Evidence from a field experiment. The Review of Financial Studies30(6), 1935-1970.
7. Cooper, R. (2017). Supply chain development for the lean enterprise: interorganizational cost management. Routledge.
8. da Silva, R. F., Filgueira, R., Pietri, I., Jiang, M., Sakellariou, R., & Deelman, E. (2017). A characterization of workflow management systems for extreme-scale applications. Future Generation Computer Systems75, 228-238.
9. Diefenbach, U., Wald, A., & Gleich, R. (2018). Between cost and benefit: investigating effects of cost management control systems on cost efficiency and organisational performance. Journal of Management Control29(1), 63-89.
10. Fuller, M. A., Valacich, J. S., George, J. F., & Schneider, C. (2017). Information Systems Project Management: A Process and Team Approach, Edition 1.1. Prospect Press.
11. Harris, E. (2017). Strategic project risk appraisal and management. Routledge.
12. Harrison, F., & Lock, D. (2017). Advanced project management: a structured approach. Routledge.
13. Heldman, K. (2018). PMP: project management professional exam study guide. John Wiley & Sons.
14. Hopkin, P. (2018). Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management. Kogan Page Publishers.
15. Husin, S., & Malahayati, N. (2018, May). Identifying inaccuracy of MS Project using system analysis. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 352, No. 1, p. 012036). IOP Publishing.
16. Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards: a guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. John Wiley & Sons.
17. Kerzner, H. (2018). Project management best practices: Achieving global excellence. John Wiley & Sons.
18. Kerzner, H., & Kerzner, H. R. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
19. Markou, C., Koulinas, G. K., & Vavatsikos, A. P. (2017). Project resources scheduling and leveling using Multi-Attribute Decision Models: Models implementation and case study. Expert Systems with Applications77, 160-169.
20. Nicholas, J. M., & Steyn, H. (2017). Project management for engineering, business and technology. Routledge.
21. Papke-Shields, K. E., & Boyer-Wright, K. M. (2017). Strategic planning characteristics applied to project management. International Journal of Project Management35(2), 169-179.
22. Shakeri, M., Shayestegan, M., Abunima, H., Reza, S. S., Akhtaruzzaman, M., Alamoud, A. R. M., ... & Amin, N. (2017). An intelligent system architecture in home energy management systems (HEMS) for efficient demand response in smart grid. Energy and Buildings138, 154-164.
23. Stair, R., & Reynolds, G. (2017). Fundamentals ofinformation systems. Cengage Learning.
24. Wager, K. A., Lee, F. W., & Glaser, J. P. (2017). Health care information systems: a practical approach for health care management. John Wiley & Sons.