Delivery in day(s): 5
ACC8000 Research in Accounting Practice
This assessment will test your individual response to the questions including in this document. You have to show your skills and the knowledge relevant to the application of skills, as well as your communication skills.
The weight of this assessment is 50%.
1. Show the knowledge of applied research problems in financial accounting and prepare strategies for their solution.
2. Show the understanding of applied research methods.
3. Show an understanding of applied research problems in auditing, and prepare strategies for their solutions.
4. Collect and analyze accounting research data using applied research data using applied research methods.
5. Designing applied accounting research methods.
This assessment has 2 parts. Part 1 describes issues in financial accounting and contains 55% and word limit is 1650 of this assignment. Part 2 describes issues in auditing and contains 45% and word limit is 1350 of this assessment.
You have to prepare a report that is backed by scholarly literature addressing the following issues regarding approaches to compensation:
a. Typical elements of compensation packages (6 marks)
b. Outline the key assumptions of traditional agency theory and their influence on approaches to compensation (8 marks)
c. Explain the difference between extrinsic and intrinsic motivation and the relationship between the two motivations. (6 marks)
d. How might an employee’s attitude to risk influence their desired compensation package? (4 marks)
e. How might the time period when an employee receives a financial benefit influence they desire for the benefit? (4 marks)
f. What role do fairness considerations have when determining compensation? (4 marks)
g. The benefits that might be expected from using an executive compensation committee. (3marks)
h. How to structure an executive compensation committee to achieve reasonable but not excessive compensation, while still retaining executives. (6 marks)
i. Conclusion: use the information in your previous answers to develop recommendations for determining compensation that enhances job satisfaction and works motivation. (4 marks)
j. Appropriate report formatting (title page, table of contents, introduction and appropriate headings, an executive summary is NOT required) (6 marks)
k. Adequate in-text references and reference list following Harvard style. (4 marks)
Part 2 (total marks 45)
1. Read the paper by Gold, Gronewold, and Pott (2012):
a. What is the aim of the research paper/project? (3 marks)
b. Draw a table to illustrate the 2 x 3 design (p. 292) showing the six groups and the different information that each group received. (6 marks)
c. What was the purpose of the manipulation checks? (4 marks)
2. Read the study by Agyei, Aye, and Owusu-Yeboah (2013); along with the study by Okafor and Otalor (2013):
a. Briefly outline the research aims of each study. (4 marks)
b. Explain how each study attempts to measure the audit expectation gap and comment on which approach you think is more rigorous, stating reasons why you believe one approach is superior in its rigor. (6 marks)
c. Explain how each study selects the research participants and comment on which approach you think is more rigorous, stating reasons why you believe one approach is superior. (6 marks)
d. Outline the response rate in each study and whether you think the response rates are adequate in each study. (6 marks)
e. Explain how each study goes about analyzing the data that is collected and comment on which approach you think is more rigorous, stating reasons why you believe one approach is superior in its rigor. (6 marks)
f. Briefly outline two other significant flaws that you have noticed in the studies. (4 marks)
Challenges face by students
In completing this assessment, students faced many difficulties like lack of writing skills, issues in auditing, making references, making report etc. Such students can take help and guidance from our academic experts. Our experts will help you in the best way to your Research in Accounting Practice.